Quick answer: Only if the specified attachment has been designed and validated for the transmitted load. Contact with a wall is not proof of retention.
Can the housing wall alone retain the outer spring end?
Outer-end engagement depends on its geometry and the mating housing feature. Manufacturing variation or an assembly error may reduce the retained area. Define an inspection feature and assembly direction so engagement can be confirmed before energizing the spring.
A practical verification method
Check the approved attachment in worst-permitted mating dimensions and inspect displacement after the required load sequence.
| Item | What to record | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Reference configuration | Part or assembly identity and drawing revision | Make comparisons traceable |
| Test conditions | Relevant position, direction and operating condition | Compare the same characteristic |
| Decision evidence | Check the approved attachment in worst-permitted mating dimensions and inspect displacement after the required load sequence. | Resolve the specific question before approval |
Use the result in an engineering request
Describe the observed condition and the required function separately. Include the relevant drawing revision and your results from the check above. If an acceptance limit has not been established, identify it as an open design input rather than treating a successful trial as approval.
Review the related Leading Spring product information. For a project-specific review, send the mechanism description, available geometry and the evidence relevant to this decision through the contact page.
Editorial note: AI-assisted engineering guidance, prepared from the topic-specific reasoning shown here and the company’s public product context. Illustrations explain decisions; they are not customer-case photographs or test results. Product-specific suitability requires review against your approved requirements.