Quick answer: Define the input population, accepted quantity, rework and rejects for a stated batch and inspection stage.
How should yield be reported transparently?
Combining first-pass and post-rework results can hide a process problem. Use consistent definitions when comparing periods. The rejected population also supplies evidence for design or process improvement, so keep failure categories rather than only a total percentage.
A practical verification method
Reconcile the reported quantities with batch records and confirm the same stage and definitions were used.
| Item | What to record | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Reference configuration | Part or assembly identity and drawing revision | Make comparisons traceable |
| Test conditions | Relevant position, direction and operating condition | Compare the same characteristic |
| Decision evidence | Reconcile the reported quantities with batch records and confirm the same stage and definitions were used. | Resolve the specific question before approval |
Use the result in an engineering request
Describe the observed condition and the required function separately. Include the relevant drawing revision and your results from the check above. If an acceptance limit has not been established, identify it as an open design input rather than treating a successful trial as approval.
Review the related Leading Spring product information. For a project-specific review, send the mechanism description, available geometry and the evidence relevant to this decision through the contact page.
Editorial note: AI-assisted engineering guidance, prepared from the topic-specific reasoning shown here and the company’s public product context. Illustrations explain decisions; they are not customer-case photographs or test results. Product-specific suitability requires review against your approved requirements.